Common Peer Reviewer Criticisms of Manuscripts
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Peer review of manuscripts: theory and practice.
Peer review is an important component of the process of research. It is central to the assessment of both grant applications and manuscripts intended for publication. It is not a particularly popular process — we have all had the experience of receiving negative reviews, written apparently by an illiterate with no understanding of science, of our skillfully written and insightful grant applicat...
متن کاملmSphereDirect: Author-Initiated Peer Review of Manuscripts
A little over 1 year ago, the American Society for Microbiology (ASM) launched mSphere as an open-access, online, pan-microbial sciences journal. We established two major goals: publish cutting-edge science and implement policies and processes to make the publication experience less onerous for authors (1). During our first year, we believe that we have made excellent progress in both areas. We...
متن کاملThe plight of the peer reviewer.
I read with interest the paper by Scheller et al., suggesting a better clinical outcome when patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention and stenting received an ionic contrast medium during the procedure than when non-ionic contrast media were used. These results are surprising since they completely disagree with the results of two randomized clinical trials comparing ionic and non-...
متن کاملThe Role of the Peer Reviewer.
From the Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn (Dr Jacobson); AcademyHealth, Washington, DC (Dr Fairbrother); Department of Pediatrics, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Mass (Dr Sheldrick); and Department of Pediatrics, University of California Los Angeles, Calif (Dr Szilagyi) Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. ...
متن کاملCommon Reasons for Rejecting Manuscripts at Medical Journals: A Survey of Editors and Peer Reviewers
Background. Most manuscripts submitted to medical journals are rejected for publication, but scientific data on the reasons are sparse. Some suggest that flaws occur with random frequency; others claim that deficiencies are too diverse to measure. Methods. In 1995, an eight-page questionnaire that contained 83 questions was mailed to a random sample of 50 peer reviewers for the Journal of the A...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Western Journal of Nursing Research
سال: 2020
ISSN: 0193-9459,1552-8456
DOI: 10.1177/0193945917707750